Strip Red Unit today (though well-informed source part) reports that Berlusconi himself had sworn that " I swear that as prime minister after a minute I go home and go out of politics if he come out a payment document, a demonstration of a donation of $ 600,000 to this Mr Mills. " Silvio Berlusconi, 12 March 2006.
.
now tried with the ruling no.15208 sections combined penalties of Cassation, the highest seat of Italian courts and before the Court and the Court of Appeal that Mills was indeed 'corrupt' by Prime Minister Berlusconi to $ 600,000 for 'silent' (as it did) on the illegal transactions and tax evasion offshore that allowed Knight to maintain its properties and the huge profits illegally earned abroad and the destination of some of the same to his children Marina and Piersilvio.
The Supreme Court acquitted Mills but not annulled the conviction of appeal to four years and six months to act only 'requirement' because he claims a later date prior to the consummation of the offense. In short, the crime of corruption but there has been expired by law in the prescription was shortened by the Berlusconi government that is just the same corrupting! In
TG1 Minzolini of 25 February had been given the news of 'absolution' instead of 'prescription' artfully distorting the truth as is typical of a vassal who is he and why was placed at the head of the news audience more widespread in Italy.
is where the short circuit occurs because Berlusconi 'check' the mainstream media and most common is directly as the owner of Mediaset and RAI as the government. Also as a master of Publitalia 'check' and many other newspapers through the distribution of advertising.
In Italy remained just outside his control: the TG3, a few head of newspaper and local TV with some level of follow up. We can say that we are 'almost' media dictatorship. Under these conditions get the information manipulated or not arrive at all.
It is perhaps for this reason that no one is 'offended' by this news. In other advanced democratic countries have made headlines and prompted the head of the government to resign immediately. Here is not the case! Everything remains as before, as if it never happened.
There is no longer even know who has condemned a Head of Government to avoid paying taxes and bribes to get rich illegally. All things that a serious government must 'stop' to its citizens.
If there's one thing 'outraged' at this point really is the lack of outrage that our country has tragically fallen. It will raise tomorrow?
Raffaele B.
bbc
Supreme Court, "Mills favored Berlusconi, heads
was reticent on offshore companies '
" Just the sentence imposed in October by the Milan judges' compensation
Confirmed Palazzo Chigi for any image
ROME (April 21) - "The heart of the reluctance of David Mills, in each of his testimony, is centered in the fact that he had brought only generically to Fininvest, and not to the person of Silvio Berlusconi, the ownership of offshore companies , thereby favoring the defendant in those proceedings. " It stresses the motivation in the Cassation, filed today, which said last February 25 prescribed the crime of corruption in judicial acts against British lawyer David Mills, but denying absolution.
" Mills Berlusconi favored." In addition, sections of the Criminal Cassation united - in Case 15208 - explain that Mills, with his deposition processes "Arces" and "All Iberian," Berlusconi had favored him by concealing the traceability of the companies of the so-called B segment of the Fininvest group. This is because "it had become necessary to separate the person of Silvio Berlusconi by such companies, in order to evade taxation and anti-concentration rules, while also allowing, thus, retention of ownership of huge profits illegally earned abroad and to a part of the same to Marina and Piersilvio Berlusconi. "
"Rational the ruling of the Court of Appeal . For the Supreme Court, therefore, the sentence with which the Court of Appeal of Milan, last October 27, confirmed the sentence of four years and six months imprisonment in relation to British lawyer David Mills on corruption charges in court documents to have received 600 thousand dollars in exchange for reluctant witnesses in two cases on the Fininvest group, has a ' rational structure "supported by a" logical and coherent system of argument, extended to all items offered by the process. " Instead, Mills's lawyers have been limited to "urge the reading of the evidence framework" without showing the "alleged shortcomings argumentative" and suggesting a "different reconstruction of the facts, not" feasible "in court of review.
" Just Compensation of € 250 thousand at Palazzo Chigi . The Supreme Court, explaining why he has upheld the conviction against Mills to pay with € 250 thousand Palazzo Chigi, said the British lawyer "with his conduct constituting a crime, has caused the government a non-pecuniary damages" for injury "the integrity of their image" to society and institutions.
BACKGROUND The
The Supreme Court confirms Mills was bribed to protect Berlusconi
April 22, 2010 by Peter Gomez and Antonio Mascarenhas
TG1 Minzolini of 25 February had been given the news of 'absolution' instead of 'prescription' artfully distorting the truth as is typical of a vassal who is he and why was placed at the head of the news audience more widespread in Italy.
is where the short circuit occurs because Berlusconi 'check' the mainstream media and most common is directly as the owner of Mediaset and RAI as the government. Also as a master of Publitalia 'check' and many other newspapers through the distribution of advertising.
In Italy remained just outside his control: the TG3, a few head of newspaper and local TV with some level of follow up. We can say that we are 'almost' media dictatorship. Under these conditions get the information manipulated or not arrive at all.
It is perhaps for this reason that no one is 'offended' by this news. In other advanced democratic countries have made headlines and prompted the head of the government to resign immediately. Here is not the case! Everything remains as before, as if it never happened.
There is no longer even know who has condemned a Head of Government to avoid paying taxes and bribes to get rich illegally. All things that a serious government must 'stop' to its citizens.
If there's one thing 'outraged' at this point really is the lack of outrage that our country has tragically fallen. It will raise tomorrow?
Raffaele B.
bbc
Supreme Court, "Mills favored Berlusconi, heads
was reticent on offshore companies '
" Just the sentence imposed in October by the Milan judges' compensation
Confirmed Palazzo Chigi for any image
ROME (April 21) - "The heart of the reluctance of David Mills, in each of his testimony, is centered in the fact that he had brought only generically to Fininvest, and not to the person of Silvio Berlusconi, the ownership of offshore companies , thereby favoring the defendant in those proceedings. " It stresses the motivation in the Cassation, filed today, which said last February 25 prescribed the crime of corruption in judicial acts against British lawyer David Mills, but denying absolution.
" Mills Berlusconi favored." In addition, sections of the Criminal Cassation united - in Case 15208 - explain that Mills, with his deposition processes "Arces" and "All Iberian," Berlusconi had favored him by concealing the traceability of the companies of the so-called B segment of the Fininvest group. This is because "it had become necessary to separate the person of Silvio Berlusconi by such companies, in order to evade taxation and anti-concentration rules, while also allowing, thus, retention of ownership of huge profits illegally earned abroad and to a part of the same to Marina and Piersilvio Berlusconi. "
"Rational the ruling of the Court of Appeal . For the Supreme Court, therefore, the sentence with which the Court of Appeal of Milan, last October 27, confirmed the sentence of four years and six months imprisonment in relation to British lawyer David Mills on corruption charges in court documents to have received 600 thousand dollars in exchange for reluctant witnesses in two cases on the Fininvest group, has a ' rational structure "supported by a" logical and coherent system of argument, extended to all items offered by the process. " Instead, Mills's lawyers have been limited to "urge the reading of the evidence framework" without showing the "alleged shortcomings argumentative" and suggesting a "different reconstruction of the facts, not" feasible "in court of review.
" Just Compensation of € 250 thousand at Palazzo Chigi . The Supreme Court, explaining why he has upheld the conviction against Mills to pay with € 250 thousand Palazzo Chigi, said the British lawyer "with his conduct constituting a crime, has caused the government a non-pecuniary damages" for injury "the integrity of their image" to society and institutions.
BACKGROUND The
The Supreme Court confirms Mills was bribed to protect Berlusconi
April 22, 2010 by Peter Gomez and Antonio Mascarenhas
.
Now " restituitemi the honor trampled : Silvio Berlusconi that he wrote in a letter to the Courier, October 21, 2001, promptly getting the excuses of Massimo D'Alema . Two days before the judges of the Sixth Chamber of the Supreme Court had acquitted " for lack of evidence" in the process for the bribes paid by Fininvest the Guardia di Finanza. And thus became the verdict was proof of the conspiracy. The current leader of the PDL in the House, Fabrizio Cicchitto , had asked for a " parliamentary committee on the use of political justice . The lawyer, Carlo Taormina , then Secretary, had asked " stop prosecutors . While Maurizio Gasparri , now leader of the blue in the Senate, with his usual moderation was not content to speak of a sentence that was proof of "legal persecution of the premier on which we must shed light .
Now " restituitemi the honor trampled : Silvio Berlusconi that he wrote in a letter to the Courier, October 21, 2001, promptly getting the excuses of Massimo D'Alema . Two days before the judges of the Sixth Chamber of the Supreme Court had acquitted " for lack of evidence" in the process for the bribes paid by Fininvest the Guardia di Finanza. And thus became the verdict was proof of the conspiracy. The current leader of the PDL in the House, Fabrizio Cicchitto , had asked for a " parliamentary committee on the use of political justice . The lawyer, Carlo Taormina , then Secretary, had asked " stop prosecutors . While Maurizio Gasparri , now leader of the blue in the Senate, with his usual moderation was not content to speak of a sentence that was proof of "legal persecution of the premier on which we must shed light .
.
Today the light has finally arrived. The plot was there but had not been hatched by magistrates in Milan. The President of the Council that famous acquittal, transformed into the leitmotif of many interviews and many election campaigns, he had in fact conquered to the sound of bribes . Because in reality the British lawyer David Mills , key witness in the trial for the payment of bribes to the Guardia di Finanza from Alfa, was bribed with $ 600,000 . And his reluctant testimony was crucial to obtain a driver's license Berlusconi persecuted.
. A
say are the sections together in the grounds of the Supreme Court's ruling, filed yesterday, which on February 25 confirmed the condemnation of Mills to pay € 250,000 in damages to the State and for only three months , considered the offense prescribed by him committed. The paper explains how " the heart of the reluctance of Mills ... focuses ultimately in the fact that he had brought only generically to Fininvest, and not to the person of Silvio Berlusconi, the ownership of offshore companies " which he created. And as this lie has had important consequences. The judges hearing the Guardia di Finanza, it is stated on page 27 of his motives, for they were forced "to proceed by induction, with the result that its lack of firm evidence on this point was decided in the process Arces and others (Fininvest bribes , ed), the acquittal of Silvio Berlusconi in the second degree and, finally, in court of Cassation.
say are the sections together in the grounds of the Supreme Court's ruling, filed yesterday, which on February 25 confirmed the condemnation of Mills to pay € 250,000 in damages to the State and for only three months , considered the offense prescribed by him committed. The paper explains how " the heart of the reluctance of Mills ... focuses ultimately in the fact that he had brought only generically to Fininvest, and not to the person of Silvio Berlusconi, the ownership of offshore companies " which he created. And as this lie has had important consequences. The judges hearing the Guardia di Finanza, it is stated on page 27 of his motives, for they were forced "to proceed by induction, with the result that its lack of firm evidence on this point was decided in the process Arces and others (Fininvest bribes , ed), the acquittal of Silvio Berlusconi in the second degree and, finally, in court of Cassation.
.
The matter becomes clearer if you go read what happened. Berlusconi, then accused of four different tangential to the yellow flames, along with the chief executive officer of the tax Fininvest Salvatore Sciascia (and later convicted today appointed parliament), comes out with broken bones from the first grade. On appeal, however, is the first plot twist .
The matter becomes clearer if you go read what happened. Berlusconi, then accused of four different tangential to the yellow flames, along with the chief executive officer of the tax Fininvest Salvatore Sciascia (and later convicted today appointed parliament), comes out with broken bones from the first grade. On appeal, however, is the first plot twist .
.
With the granting of extenuating circumstances the Knight gets prescription for three charges and was acquitted in accordance with subparagraph of Article 530 seconds (the old lack of evidence), by quarter. What concerns that a bribe paid by Sciascia a patrol was investigating the real property Telepiù , the first Italian pay-TV, founded by his Berlusconi. That money had indeed been stretched so in 1994 because investigators shut his eyes. And it was equally certain that if the survey had shown that Berlusconi, through an elaborate network of offshore companies and nominees, controlled the issuer, for him the risk of being penalized by the withdrawal of concessions Channel 5 , Italy 1, and Rete 4 would be very high. But after listening to Mills the courts of appeal had been uncertainty as "fictitious " header shares Telepiù to Berlusconi for them, was not proven 100 percent.
. In fact
pay TV were also present other members and then, at least in guessing, too, and could have little interest in a thorough investigation. When in doubt, was so taken that the acquittal, a waterfall, had led the Supreme Court to rule the same way on other tangents.
pay TV were also present other members and then, at least in guessing, too, and could have little interest in a thorough investigation. When in doubt, was so taken that the acquittal, a waterfall, had led the Supreme Court to rule the same way on other tangents.
.
Today, however, the motivation of the sections together on the case Mills puts things right. It also recalls the premier , used to say "I've always been acquitted " actually has been saved thanks to the condemnation prescription for 21 billion lire paid in 1991 to the then foreign secretary on foreign of the PSI, Craxi.
.
Pending threatened judicial reform, a good blow to a political leader who is still on 9 December, before the assembly of the EPP, thus explaining his hitherto successful judicial parable: "In Italy only a the judges are with the left, while the judges especially the second and third levels are as real as judges in other countries . "Today" real judges "have spoken. The leader of the PDL is one that has done away with. paying, of course.
0 comments:
Post a Comment